Become an Insider Gold member to monitor your funds.

3.7  /  0.31%


NAV on 2019/05/22
NAV on 2019/05/21 1198.76
52 week high on 2018/06/05 1405.98
52 week low on 2019/04/01 1183.82
Total Expense Ratio on 0
Total Expense Ratio (performance fee) on 0
NAV Incl Dividends
1 month change -1.41% -1.41%
3 month change -5% -1.66%
6 month change -3.43% -0.04%
1 year change -12.72% -7.26%
5 year change -1.13% 3.69%
10 year change 0% 0%
Price data is updated once a day.
  • Sectoral allocations
General Equity 134.27 98.27%
Liquid Assets 2.36 1.73%
  • Top five holdings
U-SIMPROP 134.24 98.25%
U-SIMPROP 0.03 0.02%
  • Performance against peers
  • Fund data  
Management company:
Sanlam Collective Investments
Formation date:
ISIN code:
Short name:
Contact details

No email address listed.

No website listed.


  • Fund management  
Satrix Investment Team

  • Fund manager's comment

Sanlam Namibia Property Fund - Sep 18

2018/12/19 00:00:00
Market Review
The SA Listed Property Index (SAPY) returned a total of -1% in Q3’18, actually outperforming equities (-3.3%) but still lagging cash, which obviously still delivers positive nominal returns even as risk assets have declined in absolute terms. Year to date (YTD), the SAPY has materially underperformed all other domestic asset classes, returning -22.2% YTD versus -8% for general equities and about +5% for cash.
The best performing shares in the SAPY for the quarter included Echo Polska (+18%); Equites (+13.6%), Fortress A (+10%) and MAS Real Estate (+9%). In contrast, the worst performers were Accelerate (-16%), Growthpoint (-13%), Rebosis (-13%) and Hyprop (-10%). However, some of the negative moves in the worst performers were exacerbated by them paying out dividends in the quarter.
Contributing to the negative returns for these shares were a number of SA-focused mid- and smaller caps reporting weak distribution growth and even weaker (declining in some cases) forecast distributions, such as Accelerate, Rebosis and SA Corporate, while even larger caps like Growthpoint and Hyprop reported and are targeting low single-digit growth rates.
What SIM did
Before fees, the SIM Property Fund outperformed the SAPY by 0.12% for the quarter, and YTD, the fund has materially outperformed the SAPY by 2.45%, somewhat cushioning the large negative return experienced by the sector this year.
The main action of the fund in Q3’18 was to trim overweight positions in pure Rand hedges Echo Polska and Investec Australia during a period of Rand weakness, as these shares actually went up even as the index, and in particular, SA-focused stocks, actually fell in absolute terms. The proceeds were mainly used to add to a basket of high-yield large-cap SAfocused REITS such as Growthpoint, Redefine, Hyprop and Attacq, as well as a basket of even higher-yielding mid-cap SA-focused REITS such as SA Corporate, Rebosis and Investec Property Fund.
These SA REITS the fund added to in the quarter are anywhere from 15% to 30% lower from their Ramaphoria highs, and offer attractive dividend yields of about 9% for the larger caps (Growthpoint, Redefine, Hyprop), and 10% or more for the mid-caps (SA Corporate, Rebosis, Investec Property Fund).
Following the weak YTD returns, the SAPY has derated from a 6.8% clean forward yield at end Q4’17 to an attractive 8.6% trailing income yield and about a 9% clean forward yield. The forward yield is a slight premium to the SA long-bond yield of 9.1%, which itself derated this year as Ramaphoria faded and amid general emerging market weakness on account of an impending trade war.
We consider these levels to now be very cheap on average, in absolute terms, and certainly relative to SA cash. The income yield alone is over 3% higher than inflation expectations, and over 1% higher than cash rates. With the SAPY also likely giving growth in dividends (unlike cash and bonds) of CPI in the long run (4% to 6% p.a.), buying at the current price levels may make for a total medium- to long-term (three- to five-year horizon) expected return of 13% to 15% p.a. from here. Further, given the sharp sell-off this year, it is also possible that investors at these levels also benefit from a rerating of the sector back to an 8% or, best case, 7% or so yield. If the sector does indeed rerate back to, say, the midpoint, or a 7.5% yield from current levels, investors from current price levels could benefit from an additional once-off capital rerating return of c.15%, which, when amortised over five years, leads to an expected five-year total return of 16% to 18% p.a. compounded.
This can be roughly broken up into an entry forward yield of 9%, plus dividend growth of 4% to 6% plus the potential capital rerating benefit of c.3% p.a. The first two components we have a fair degree of certainty of receiving. However, the third component ? capital rerating ? is the most uncertain and speculative and certainly non-linear given the volatility of financial markets. Indeed, in the short term this capital rerating component can continue to be negative as it has been so far YTD, before it reverses. This is especially given our current interesting times ? anything from local politics, or international politics where potential trade wars between the US and China could continue to have an adverse shorter-term impact on financial markets’ price levels worldwide.
There are also some fundamental headwinds that could take time for the abovementioned expected return to be realised. As previously mentioned, some of the smaller REITS have cut their distribution outlooks, in some cases to negative growth. In terms of how this weaker outlook for property distributions may have materialised, even supermarkets like Shoprite are struggling to grow earnings (earnings down 3%), highlighting a tough SA economy - as a tenant, them or clothing retailers like Foschini or Truworths struggling to themselves grow ultimately filters into the REITS as lower rental growth or even worse, vacancies as they cut space in a bid to trim their own cost base in an environment of weak revenue growth.
Further, because the REITS are priced cheaply at the moment, it makes it difficult for them to do accretive acquisitions, which has in the past added to dividend growth rates. It is difficult for a company trading on 9% or 10% yields to raise capital and then buy an asset yielding more than that in order to create acquisitive growth; whereas not too long ago, they were able to raise capital at a 6% or 7% yield to buy something at a 9% or 10% yield, thus creating some excess earnings growth per share. In other words, now they have to rely almost entirely on organic growth, which is unlikely to exceed CPI, or at the very best contractual escalations, which may be 7% p.a. at this stage.
However, the sharp derating to the high-income yields of 9% to 10% for SA-focused shares hopefully provides an adequate cushion for the above considerations; and hopefully with dividends now largely rebased, growth from the current earnings base resumes in the CPI range, more or less in from the current earnings base resumes in the CPI range, more or less in line with contractual rental escalations of 7% p.a. less some allowance for vacancies, defaults, rental resets, maintenance capex, etc.
  • Fund focus and objective  
Insider GOLD
ONLY R63pm

Moneyweb's premium subscription is a membership service which will give you access to a number of tools to take charge of your investments.
Or choose a yearly subscription at R630pa - SAVE R126

Get instant access to all our tools and content. Monthly subscription can be suspended at any time.



Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: